点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
元宇宙场景加入 2022年广州国际灯光节创新开启******
中新网广州12月27日电 (记者 许青青)以“粤韵光彩·未来创想”为主题的2022年第十一届广州国际灯光节27日晚正式亮灯。值得一提的是，今年的灯光节不仅是首次线上亮灯，还创新应用了虚实融合的元宇宙场景，让观众在超级数字场景的技术应用下，完成一次虚实相生的云旅游，跨时空欣赏羊城之美。
广州塔及珠江两岸亮灯。 隋健 摄当日晚，在“云看灯光节”会场中，随着“3、2、1，亮灯！”声音响起，吉祥物“亮仔”作为特别主持人，与来自数字分会场的“光子鸡”一起，和众多市民游客在云端共同参与了一场梦幻感、科技感十足的线上亮灯活动，一同见证了本届灯光节正式“云启动”。与此同时，广州塔AR灯光展示也在数字分会场中同步正式上线。
在线下，除了北京路商圈、一江两岸的灯光作品一同亮起，南沙区分会场亦同步亮相。还同时设立了多组多媒体演绎和联动展示，包括利用沿江路24栋建筑媒体立面、猎德桥网屏、琶洲西区建筑媒体立面、北京路商圈大屏播放多媒体作品，以海心桥、珠江游轮、广州塔等现有景观照明资源进行联动景观展示。
记者在现场看到，流光溢彩的灯光与现代化的城市影像结合，如同一幅幅跃动斑斓的画卷，在珠江畔边铺展、流淌，展现出面向新未来、新畅想，每个人对于广州这座城市共同的美好祝福以及美美与共的生活热爱。
今年广州国际灯光节还首次尝试线上的形式，在科技感与参与性上寻求突破，更加注重科技创造与艺术创意的融合。在本届灯光节的小程序“云看灯光节”中，通过虚实融合的元宇宙场景应用，结合强交互的用户体验，一共设立了8大核心版块，包括亮仔的宇宙乐园、云游分会场、AR灯光展示、行者为光、十年展示窗、系列活动、亮仔与他的小伙伴们以及数字分会场。
2022广州国际灯光节元宇宙场景。 视频截图 摄其中，亮仔的宇宙乐园以“畅游宇宙，圆梦广州”为主题，通过UE5引擎技术的使用，将花城广场、海心沙亚运公园等城市地标的虚拟场景在线上全景重现。共展现了10组作品，从1号作品到7号作品分别为《月满花城》《走进亮仔的宇宙乐园》《绿色空间转移站》《时间的宫殿》《未来车间》《生命之树》以及《梦想舞台》。8号到10号分别为《云上舞月，情满花城》《行者为光——致敬城市的践行者》《唱响湾区——未来家园》三个篇章的演出。
2022广州国际灯光节元宇宙场景。 视频截图 摄据悉，本届灯光节为期13天。除了线下观灯，从12月27日起，市民游客在每晚18点到23点，通过“云看灯光节”小程序进入到“亮仔的宇宙乐园”中，便可解锁“宇宙巡演”版块，参与到一场超写实视觉效果、沉浸式体验的元宇宙互动盛典。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)